In his signature crusading style, Pilger argued that global hunger is not a "natural" disaster or a simple matter of scarcity, but a calculated geopolitical tool used by powerful nations—predominantly the United States—to control weaker regimes. The Core Argument: Food as a Weapon
: In the 1970s, the U.S. General Accounting Office found that a majority of American food aid was directed toward "politically acceptable" regimes rather than the hungriest nations. john pilger we can'T keep eaTing like This
Though the original report is decades old, the sentiment "we can’t keep eating like this" remains relevant in modern discussions of Pilger's legacy: In his signature crusading style, Pilger argued that
His work serves as a reminder that the global food system is inherently political, and "eating like this"—a system built on the exploitation of the Global South for the consumption of the North—is both morally and logistically unsustainable. AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more Though the original report is decades old, the
: He highlighted a world where the richest five men doubled their wealth while five billion people lost ground, often through the same extractive economic systems that govern food production.
: Pilger was a fierce critic of "compliant media" that portrayed food crises as unavoidable tragedies rather than the results of specific policy decisions.