27cc3576a6f149e95cf68afc3e25cd6c.zip -

One reviewer pointed out that the methods ZIP was compared against (like BLACKVIP and BPTVLM) were from 2023, and suggested that more recent 2024 benchmarks should have been included for a fairer comparison.

Evaluators noted superior accuracy across 13+ different tasks and strong performance in "few-shot" settings (learning from very little data). 27cc3576a6f149e95cf68afc3e25cd6c.zip

It looks like there's no response available for this search. Try asking something else. One reviewer pointed out that the methods ZIP

While the reviews were generally positive, experts noted a few areas for improvement: including detailed ablation studies.

Reviewers from the research community have shared their direct impressions of the work:

Reviewers pointed out that the soft prompt reparameterization design choices were thoroughly tested, including detailed ablation studies.