125978

: The court ruled that sharing biometric data with even a single third-party vendor —in this case, the salon's fingerprint system provider—constituted a "publication".

The case began when a customer filed a class-action lawsuit against a tanning salon, , alleging the salon collected fingerprints without providing the proper written disclosures required by BIPA. 125978

: West Bend argued that a "violation of statutes" exclusion barred coverage. However, the court ruled this exclusion only applied to statutes governing methods of communication (like the TCPA or CAN-SPAM Act), not privacy laws like BIPA. 📈 Why This Matters for Businesses : The court ruled that sharing biometric data

The Illinois Supreme Court ruling in (2021 IL 125978) stands as a landmark decision for privacy law and insurance coverage. It clarified when insurers must defend businesses facing class-action lawsuits under the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) . ⚖️ The Core Conflict: Biometrics and Insurance However, the court ruled this exclusion only applied